Copper vs Keap: The Complete 2026 Comparison

Choosing between Copper and Keap for crm? This in-depth comparison breaks down pricing, features, user ratings, integrations, and real-world use cases to help you make the right decision. Both tools serve the crm category, but they take distinctly different approaches to helping teams get work done.

Founded in 2013, Copper is a CRM built natively for Google Workspace, living inside Gmail and Google Calendar. Meanwhile, Keap was founded in 2001. Keap (formerly Infusionsoft) is a CRM and marketing automation platform built for small businesses and solopreneurs. Let us dive into how they stack up across every dimension that matters.

Quick Verdict

Copper edges ahead with a G2 rating of 4.5/5 (based on 1,100 reviews) versus Keap's 4.2/5 (1,500 reviews). However, Keap holds its own with 12 key features and competitive pricing starting at $249/month (2 users). If budget is your top priority, Copper ($49/user/month (Professional) at the pro tier) is the more affordable option.

At-a-Glance: Copper vs Keap

Before we dive into the details, here is a high-level overview of how Copper and Keap compare across the key criteria most teams care about when evaluating crm software.

Criteria Copper Keap
G2 Rating 4.5/5 (1,100 reviews) 4.2/5 (1,500 reviews)
Free Plan $23/user/month (Basic) $249/month (2 users)
Pro Pricing $49/user/month (Professional) $249/month (Ignite)
Enterprise $99/user/month (Business) $329/month (Grow)
Founded 2013 2001
Key Features 12 features 12 features
Integrations 10+ integrations 10+ integrations
Category CRM CRM
Website www.copper.com keap.com

About Copper

Copper is a CRM built natively for Google Workspace, living inside Gmail and Google Calendar. It automatically captures contacts and interactions, reducing data entry and making it the go-to CRM for Google-centric teams and agencies. Founded in 2013, Copper has built a reputation in the crm space, earning a 4.5/5 rating on G2 from 1,100 verified user reviews. The platform offers 12 distinct features and integrates with 10+ third-party tools.

Copper's core strengths include Google Workspace integration, Contact management, Pipeline management, Email tracking, Task management. Teams that choose Copper typically value its approach to Google Workspace integration and Contact management, which sets it apart in the crowded crm landscape.

About Keap

Keap (formerly Infusionsoft) is a CRM and marketing automation platform built for small businesses and solopreneurs. It combines contact management, email marketing, payments, and appointments in one platform to help small businesses automate their growth. Since its founding in 2001, Keap has grown to serve teams worldwide, achieving a 4.2/5 G2 rating from 1,500 reviews. The platform provides 12 key features and supports 10+ integrations.

Keap's standout capabilities include CRM and contact management, Marketing automation, Sales pipeline, Email marketing, Appointments scheduling. Teams gravitating toward Keap often prioritize CRM and contact management and Marketing automation, making it a strong fit for organizations that need these specific capabilities.

Pricing Breakdown: Copper vs Keap

Pricing is often the deciding factor when choosing crm software. Here is how Copper and Keap stack up across their pricing tiers. Note that both tools may offer annual billing discounts, and prices shown are for monthly billing as of 2026.

Plan Copper Keap
Starter / Free $23/user/month (Basic) $249/month (2 users)
Pro / Business $49/user/month (Professional) $249/month (Ignite)
Enterprise $99/user/month (Business) $329/month (Grow)

Pricing verdict: Copper is the more budget-friendly option at the pro tier, costing $49/user/month (Professional) compared to $249/month (Ignite) for Keap. However, pricing alone should not drive your decision -- consider the total value each platform delivers relative to its cost. A tool that costs more but saves your team hours each week may actually be the more economical choice in the long run.

Keep in mind that both tools offer free plans or trials, so you can test each platform before committing. For teams of 10 or fewer, both Copper and Keap provide functional free tiers that let you evaluate the core experience without spending anything.

Feature Comparison: Copper vs Keap

Feature availability can make or break your team's productivity. Below is a detailed comparison of every feature offered by either Copper or Keap. This checklist covers 23 features across both platforms, giving you a comprehensive view of what each tool brings to the table.

Feature Copper Keap
Activity feed Yes No
Appointments scheduling No Yes
Automated follow-ups No Yes
CRM and contact management No Yes
Contact management Yes No
Custom fields Yes No
E-commerce No Yes
Email marketing No Yes
Email tracking Yes No
Goal tracking Yes No
Google Workspace integration Yes No
Invoicing and payments No Yes
Landing pages No Yes
Lead scoring No Yes
Leaderboards Yes No
Marketing automation No Yes
Pipeline management Yes No
Reporting Yes Yes
Sales pipeline No Yes
Task management Yes No
Text marketing No Yes
Web forms Yes No
Workflow automation Yes No

Copper offers 12 features while Keap provides 12. The features unique to Copper include Google Workspace integration, Contact management, Pipeline management. Keap's unique features include CRM and contact management, Marketing automation, Sales pipeline.

Integrations: Copper vs Keap

In today's software landscape, no tool exists in isolation. The integrations a crm tool supports determine how well it fits into your existing tech stack. Here is how Copper and Keap compare in terms of third-party integrations.

Shared integrations (3): Gmail, Zapier, QuickBooks. Both tools connect to these popular platforms, so if these are your critical integrations, neither tool has an advantage.

Unique to Copper: Google Workspace, Google Calendar, Slack, Mailchimp, DocuSign, RingCentral, HubSpot.

Unique to Keap: Outlook, WordPress, Shopify, PayPal, Stripe, Leadpages, Calendly.

Both platforms support Zapier or similar automation tools, which means you can build custom integrations even if a native connection is not available. When evaluating integrations, focus on the ones your team uses daily rather than the total count.

User Ratings and Community Sentiment

Real user reviews provide invaluable insight beyond feature lists. Here is how the community has rated Copper and Keap on G2, one of the most trusted software review platforms.

Metric Copper Keap
G2 Rating 4.5/5 4.2/5
Total Reviews 1,100 1,500
Years on Market 13 years (since 2013) 25 years (since 2001)

Copper leads with a 4.5/5 G2 rating compared to Keap's 4.2/5. The 0.3-point gap is meaningful given that both tools have thousands of reviews. Copper's rating is based on 1,100 reviews, providing strong statistical confidence in the score.

Which Tool Should You Pick? Use-Case Verdicts

The best crm tool is not universal -- it depends on your team size, budget, workflow requirements, and existing tech stack. Here are our recommendations for three common scenarios that cover most teams evaluating Copper and Keap.

Scenario 1: Small Teams and Startups (Under 20 People)

For small teams on a budget, Copper offers a more affordable entry point with its $23/user/month (Basic) free tier. Keap may be easier to adopt quickly due to its more focused feature set, reducing onboarding time. However, Copper offers more room to grow as your team scales, with 12 features compared to 12.

Our pick: Keap -- Faster setup and lower complexity for small teams.

Scenario 2: Mid-Size Companies (20-200 People)

Mid-size teams need robust crm with good reporting and integrations. Copper offers integrations with Google Workspace, Gmail, Google Calendar, Slack, while Keap connects to Gmail, Outlook, QuickBooks, Zapier. For cross-functional teams, Copper provides stronger customization options. Both tools handle enterprise-grade workloads, but the Copper's higher G2 rating (4.5/5 from 1,100 reviews) suggests better overall satisfaction at scale.

Our pick: Copper -- Higher G2 rating (4.5/5) and stronger user satisfaction.

Scenario 3: Enterprise and Software Development Teams

At the enterprise level, integration depth, security, and workflow customization matter most. Copper's enterprise plan ($99/user/month (Business)) is more cost-effective compared to Keap ($329/month (Grow)). For development teams specifically, look at Git integrations: .

Our pick: Keap -- More extensive user base providing better community support and proven reliability.

Final Recommendation: Copper vs Keap

After analyzing pricing, features, ratings, integrations, and real-world use cases, here is our bottom line on the Copper vs Keap decision.

Choose Copper if: You want Google Workspace integration, Contact management, Pipeline management, and your team values a focused tool that does fewer things well. Copper's $23/user/month (Basic) entry point makes it accessible to try, and its 10+ integrations ensure it fits into most tech stacks. Despite being newer (founded 2013), Copper has proven itself with 1,100 G2 reviews.

Choose Keap if: You prioritize CRM and contact management, Marketing automation, Sales pipeline, and your team needs a streamlined tool without unnecessary complexity. At $249/month (Ignite) per user per month (pro tier), Keap delivers strong value for its price point. Keap's 25-year track record speaks to its reliability and staying power.

Whichever tool you choose, we recommend starting with the free plan or trial to evaluate how it works with your specific team's workflow. Run a two-week pilot with a small project before making a company-wide commitment. The right crm tool is the one your team will actually use consistently -- and that can only be determined through hands-on experience.

Switching Between Copper and Keap

If you are currently using one tool and considering switching to the other, here are some tips to make the migration smoother. Most crm tools support data export in CSV or JSON formats, and both Copper and Keap offer import functionality.

Start by exporting your current projects, tasks, and custom fields. Map your existing workflow to the new tool's structure before migrating data. Plan for a 2-4 week transition period where both tools run in parallel, and designate team champions to help with adoption. Consider using a third-party migration service if you have complex data structures or a large number of projects to transfer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Copper better than Keap?

Copper has a higher G2 rating (4.5/5 vs 4.2/5 from 1,100 reviews), but the best tool depends on your needs. Copper stands out for Google Workspace integration, Contact management, Pipeline management, while Keap excels at CRM and contact management, Marketing automation, Sales pipeline.

How much does Copper cost compared to Keap?

Copper's pro plan costs $49/user/month (Professional) while Keap's pro plan costs $249/month (Ignite). Copper starts at $23/user/month (Basic) and Keap starts at $249/month (2 users). Enterprise pricing is $99/user/month (Business) for Copper and $329/month (Grow) for Keap.

Can Copper and Keap integrate with each other?

While direct integration varies, both Copper and Keap connect to common platforms including Gmail, Zapier, QuickBooks. Third-party tools like Zapier can bridge any gaps between the two.

Which tool is easier to learn, Copper or Keap?

Copper (founded 2013) and Keap (founded 2001) take different approaches to usability. Copper generally has a simpler learning curve with fewer features to master, while Keap offers more features but may take longer to fully adopt.

What are the main differences between Copper and Keap?

The key differences are: (1) Pricing -- Copper starts at $23/user/month (Basic) vs Keap at $249/month (2 users). (2) G2 ratings -- Copper has 4.5/5 vs Keap at 4.2/5. (3) Features -- Copper focuses on Google Workspace integration, Contact management, Pipeline management, while Keap emphasizes CRM and contact management, Marketing automation, Sales pipeline. (4) Founded -- Copper (2013) vs Keap (2001).

How We Compared Copper and Keap

This comparison is based on publicly available data including G2 user ratings and review counts, official pricing pages, published feature lists, and integration directories. Ratings and pricing data are approximate and were last verified in 2026. We encourage readers to check each tool's official website for the most current information, as pricing and features may change.

Our analysis covers pricing (free, pro, and enterprise tiers), features (23 features compared), integrations (20 total across both tools), user ratings (combined 2,600 G2 reviews), and use-case suitability (small teams, mid-size companies, and enterprises). We aim to provide objective, data-driven comparisons to help you make informed decisions.

Still not sure which tool is right for you?

Take our 60-second quiz and get a personalized recommendation based on your team size, budget, and must-have features.

Find Your Perfect Tool