Miro vs Penpot: The Complete 2026 Comparison

Choosing between Miro and Penpot for design? This in-depth comparison breaks down pricing, features, user ratings, integrations, and real-world use cases to help you make the right decision. Both tools serve the design category, but they take distinctly different approaches to helping teams get work done.

Founded in 2011, Miro is the leading online collaborative whiteboard platform, used by 60+ million users for brainstorming, planning, and workshops. Meanwhile, Penpot was founded in 2019. Penpot is the first open-source design and prototyping platform, built on web standards (SVG, CSS, HTML). Let us dive into how they stack up across every dimension that matters.

Quick Verdict

Miro edges ahead with a G2 rating of 4.7/5 (based on 6,400 reviews) versus Penpot's 4.3/5 (210 reviews). However, Penpot holds its own with 12 key features and competitive pricing starting at Free (self-hosted, unlimited).

At-a-Glance: Miro vs Penpot

Before we dive into the details, here is a high-level overview of how Miro and Penpot compare across the key criteria most teams care about when evaluating design software.

Criteria Miro Penpot
G2 Rating 4.7/5 (6,400 reviews) 4.3/5 (210 reviews)
Free Plan Free (3 editable boards) Free (self-hosted, unlimited)
Pro Pricing $8/member/month (Starter) Free (cloud, unlimited)
Enterprise $16/member/month (Business) Custom pricing (premium support)
Founded 2011 2019
Key Features 12 features 12 features
Integrations 10+ integrations 10+ integrations
Category Design Design
Website miro.com penpot.app

About Miro

Miro is the leading online collaborative whiteboard platform, used by 60+ million users for brainstorming, planning, and workshops. Its infinite canvas, extensive template library, and real-time collaboration make it essential for distributed teams and design thinking sessions. Founded in 2011, Miro has built a reputation in the design space, earning a 4.7/5 rating on G2 from 6,400 verified user reviews. The platform offers 12 distinct features and integrates with 10+ third-party tools.

Miro's core strengths include Infinite canvas, Sticky notes and shapes, Templates library, Mind mapping, Flowcharts and diagrams. Teams that choose Miro typically value its approach to Infinite canvas and Sticky notes and shapes, which sets it apart in the crowded design landscape.

About Penpot

Penpot is the first open-source design and prototyping platform, built on web standards (SVG, CSS, HTML). It is completely free with no paywalls, supports self-hosting, and uses CSS-native layout tools like Flexbox and Grid, bridging the gap between design and development. Since its founding in 2019, Penpot has grown to serve teams worldwide, achieving a 4.3/5 G2 rating from 210 reviews. The platform provides 12 key features and supports 10+ integrations.

Penpot's standout capabilities include Vector editing, Prototyping, Components, Design tokens, Real-time collaboration. Teams gravitating toward Penpot often prioritize Vector editing and Prototyping, making it a strong fit for organizations that need these specific capabilities.

Pricing Breakdown: Miro vs Penpot

Pricing is often the deciding factor when choosing design software. Here is how Miro and Penpot stack up across their pricing tiers. Note that both tools may offer annual billing discounts, and prices shown are for monthly billing as of 2026.

Plan Miro Penpot
Starter / Free Free (3 editable boards) Free (self-hosted, unlimited)
Pro / Business $8/member/month (Starter) Free (cloud, unlimited)
Enterprise $16/member/month (Business) Custom pricing (premium support)

Pricing verdict: Both Miro and Penpot are competitively priced. Focus on which tool delivers more value for your specific workflow rather than optimizing purely on cost. Consider running a trial of both tools with your team to see which drives better outcomes.

Keep in mind that both tools offer free plans or trials, so you can test each platform before committing. For teams of 10 or fewer, both Miro and Penpot provide functional free tiers that let you evaluate the core experience without spending anything.

Feature Comparison: Miro vs Penpot

Feature availability can make or break your team's productivity. Below is a detailed comparison of every feature offered by either Miro or Penpot. This checklist covers 24 features across both platforms, giving you a comprehensive view of what each tool brings to the table.

Feature Miro Penpot
AI features Yes No
CSS-native design No Yes
Comments and reactions Yes No
Components No Yes
Design tokens No Yes
Flex layout No Yes
Flowcharts and diagrams Yes No
Grid layout No Yes
Infinite canvas Yes No
Mind mapping Yes No
Open source No Yes
Plugin system No Yes
Presentation mode Yes No
Prototyping No Yes
Real-time collaboration No Yes
SVG-native No Yes
Self-hosting No Yes
Sticky notes and shapes Yes No
Talktrack (async video) Yes No
Templates library Yes No
Vector editing No Yes
Video chat Yes No
Voting and timer Yes No
Wireframing Yes No

Miro offers 12 features while Penpot provides 12. The features unique to Miro include Infinite canvas, Sticky notes and shapes, Templates library. Penpot's unique features include Vector editing, Prototyping, Components.

Integrations: Miro vs Penpot

In today's software landscape, no tool exists in isolation. The integrations a design tool supports determine how well it fits into your existing tech stack. Here is how Miro and Penpot compare in terms of third-party integrations.

Shared integrations (1): Slack. Both tools connect to these popular platforms, so if these are your critical integrations, neither tool has an advantage.

Unique to Miro: Microsoft Teams, Jira, Confluence, Google Drive, Asana, Notion, Figma, Zapier, Zoom.

Unique to Penpot: Git, Storybook, GitHub, GitLab, Taiga, API, Webhooks, SVG import/export, Figma import.

Both platforms support Zapier or similar automation tools, which means you can build custom integrations even if a native connection is not available. When evaluating integrations, focus on the ones your team uses daily rather than the total count.

User Ratings and Community Sentiment

Real user reviews provide invaluable insight beyond feature lists. Here is how the community has rated Miro and Penpot on G2, one of the most trusted software review platforms.

Metric Miro Penpot
G2 Rating 4.7/5 4.3/5
Total Reviews 6,400 210
Years on Market 15 years (since 2011) 7 years (since 2019)

Miro leads with a 4.7/5 G2 rating compared to Penpot's 4.3/5. The 0.4-point gap is meaningful given that both tools have thousands of reviews. Miro's rating is based on 6,400 reviews, providing strong statistical confidence in the score.

Which Tool Should You Pick? Use-Case Verdicts

The best design tool is not universal -- it depends on your team size, budget, workflow requirements, and existing tech stack. Here are our recommendations for three common scenarios that cover most teams evaluating Miro and Penpot.

Scenario 1: Small Teams and Startups (Under 20 People)

For small teams on a budget, both tools offer competitive free tiers. Penpot may be easier to adopt quickly due to its more focused feature set, reducing onboarding time. However, Miro offers more room to grow as your team scales, with 12 features compared to 12.

Our pick: Penpot -- Faster setup and lower complexity for small teams.

Scenario 2: Mid-Size Companies (20-200 People)

Mid-size teams need robust design with good reporting and integrations. Miro offers integrations with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Confluence, while Penpot connects to Git, Storybook, GitHub, GitLab. For cross-functional teams, Penpot provides stronger customization options. Both tools handle enterprise-grade workloads, but the Miro's higher G2 rating (4.7/5 from 6,400 reviews) suggests better overall satisfaction at scale.

Our pick: Miro -- Higher G2 rating (4.7/5) and stronger user satisfaction.

Scenario 3: Enterprise and Software Development Teams

At the enterprise level, integration depth, security, and workflow customization matter most. Miro's enterprise plan ($16/member/month (Business)) varies compared to Penpot (Custom pricing (premium support)). For development teams specifically, look at Git integrations: Penpot integrates with GitHub.

Our pick: Miro -- More extensive user base providing better community support and proven reliability.

Final Recommendation: Miro vs Penpot

After analyzing pricing, features, ratings, integrations, and real-world use cases, here is our bottom line on the Miro vs Penpot decision.

Choose Miro if: You want Infinite canvas, Sticky notes and shapes, Templates library, and your team values a focused tool that does fewer things well. Miro's Free (3 editable boards) entry point makes it accessible to try, and its 10+ integrations ensure it fits into most tech stacks. With 15 years on the market, Miro is the more established option.

Choose Penpot if: You prioritize Vector editing, Prototyping, Components, and your team needs a streamlined tool without unnecessary complexity. At Free (cloud, unlimited) per user per month (pro tier), Penpot delivers strong value for its price point. Though founded more recently in 2019, Penpot has quickly built a strong reputation.

Whichever tool you choose, we recommend starting with the free plan or trial to evaluate how it works with your specific team's workflow. Run a two-week pilot with a small project before making a company-wide commitment. The right design tool is the one your team will actually use consistently -- and that can only be determined through hands-on experience.

Switching Between Miro and Penpot

If you are currently using one tool and considering switching to the other, here are some tips to make the migration smoother. Most design tools support data export in CSV or JSON formats, and both Miro and Penpot offer import functionality.

Start by exporting your current projects, tasks, and custom fields. Map your existing workflow to the new tool's structure before migrating data. Plan for a 2-4 week transition period where both tools run in parallel, and designate team champions to help with adoption. Consider using a third-party migration service if you have complex data structures or a large number of projects to transfer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Miro better than Penpot?

Miro has a higher G2 rating (4.7/5 vs 4.3/5 from 6,400 reviews), but the best tool depends on your needs. Miro stands out for Infinite canvas, Sticky notes and shapes, Templates library, while Penpot excels at Vector editing, Prototyping, Components.

How much does Miro cost compared to Penpot?

Miro's pro plan costs $8/member/month (Starter) while Penpot's pro plan costs Free (cloud, unlimited). Miro starts at Free (3 editable boards) and Penpot starts at Free (self-hosted, unlimited). Enterprise pricing is $16/member/month (Business) for Miro and Custom pricing (premium support) for Penpot.

Can Miro and Penpot integrate with each other?

While direct integration varies, both Miro and Penpot connect to common platforms including Slack. Third-party tools like Zapier can bridge any gaps between the two.

Which tool is easier to learn, Miro or Penpot?

Miro (founded 2011) and Penpot (founded 2019) take different approaches to usability. Miro generally has a simpler learning curve with fewer features to master, while Penpot offers more features but may take longer to fully adopt.

What are the main differences between Miro and Penpot?

The key differences are: (1) Pricing -- Miro starts at Free (3 editable boards) vs Penpot at Free (self-hosted, unlimited). (2) G2 ratings -- Miro has 4.7/5 vs Penpot at 4.3/5. (3) Features -- Miro focuses on Infinite canvas, Sticky notes and shapes, Templates library, while Penpot emphasizes Vector editing, Prototyping, Components. (4) Founded -- Miro (2011) vs Penpot (2019).

How We Compared Miro and Penpot

This comparison is based on publicly available data including G2 user ratings and review counts, official pricing pages, published feature lists, and integration directories. Ratings and pricing data are approximate and were last verified in 2026. We encourage readers to check each tool's official website for the most current information, as pricing and features may change.

Our analysis covers pricing (free, pro, and enterprise tiers), features (24 features compared), integrations (20 total across both tools), user ratings (combined 6,610 G2 reviews), and use-case suitability (small teams, mid-size companies, and enterprises). We aim to provide objective, data-driven comparisons to help you make informed decisions.

Still not sure which tool is right for you?

Take our 60-second quiz and get a personalized recommendation based on your team size, budget, and must-have features.

Find Your Perfect Tool